I'm familiar with the mil system for long range shooting. Range equals target size divided by the size seen through the scope in mils. Stereoscopic systems means that you have a binocular eyepiece, with each eye getting it's own picture from the prisms.
You adjust the prisms until the pictures line-up in your head. Coincidence is simple to use, but can be fooled by various obstructions and stuff like dazzle camouflage, while stereoscopic rangefinding needs practice to get to the same accuracy, but once achieved is much more reliable.
That's what I found looking around but I can't seem to find how it actually works. For example the mil system works because at very small angles the arc the height of the object is pretty much equal to a straight line the opposite side of a triangle. I dont think I understand you. I'll try to explain if you mean you don't understand how the range is worked out, which is sort of what I think you're asking:.
The prisms are placed apart on two sides. You have some sort of system that angles the prisms in towards each other, or out towards being paralel to each other.
Also in hunting, when you need to know just how far your intended target is before you make your shot. When shooting either arrows, bullets, or golf balls, you will need to adjust your aim several times in order to be able to hit your target. A rangefinder uses basic technology to calculate distance and it helps to improve your hunting and golfing skills. It gives the true horizontal distance to the target so that you do not fall short in your shot and end up missing the target.
No one likes to go hunting or golfing carrying heavy equipment and this is why manufacturers of rangefinders like cellphones continue to design models which are increasingly smaller in size. The technologically too is always improving and they are becoming increasingly more accurate in measuring distances. Today, rangefinders are small, compact, and more precise than ever.
Some of the links below are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, we may make a commission if you click through and make a purchase. The first modern rangefinder was developed by Scottish company Barr and Stroud in the s. Different types of range finding devices have since been introduced and these devices use different techniques to measure the distance between the observer and target.
World War 2 saw the first use of electronic range finders. Prior to this warships used massive optical rangefinders to gauge distance for the naval guns to fire at their targets. An issue of Popular Science , a monthly magazine published in February , instructs soldiers how to use rangefinders properly.
But range finding began long before this. Before modern optics and electronics were invented, the Romans used a clever device to measure distances for their projectile weapons to be fired in battle.
The Roman Dodecahedron was made of bronze and recently found artifacts date from the 2nd and 3rd century AD. After the collapse of the Roman Empire, the middle ages saw another device used to measure distances and angles. The ballista was an ancient war machine that launched large rocks and javelins over large distances.
Optical rangefinders like the coincidence rangefinder have been in use since the 18th century. The coincidence rangefinder was a feature of the old cameras, which were used for surveillance. These devices were equipped with an arrangement of lenses and prisms on both ends of the device, with the eyepiece located at the center. At either side the incident beam is reflected to the center of the optical bar by a pentaprism. The optical bar is ideally made from a material with a low coefficient of thermal expansion so that optical path lengths do not change significantly with temperature.
This reflected beam first passes through an objective lens and is then merged with the beam of the opposing side with an ocular prism sub-assembly to form two images of the target which are viewed by the observer through the eyepiece. Since either beam enters the instrument at a slightly different angle the resulting image, if unaltered, will appear blurry.
Therefore, in one arm of the instrument a compensator is adjusted by the operator to tilt the beam until the two images match. At this point the images are said to be in coincidence. The degree of rotation of the compensator determines the range to the target by simple triangulation.
The second eyepiece showed the operator a range scale so the user could range and read the range scale simultaneously. A stereoscopic range finder uses two eyepieces and relies on the operator's visual cortex to merge the two images into a single picture.
A reference mark is separately inserted into each eyepiece. The operator first adjusts the direction of the range finder so that the fixed mark is centered on the target, and then the prisms are rotated until the mark appears to overlap in the operator's combined view. The first of these reports is concerned with the comparative test of coincidence and stereoscopic range finders.
The coincidence and stereoscopic methods utilize the same basic principles of geometrical optics for the determination of the distance to a target. The two methods differ radically, however, in the nature of the criterion presented for human judgement. These British instruments were of the split field coincident type. American crews were being trained at Fort Monroe to operate the coincidence instruments but this plan was dropped when six British seamen, who were experienced range takers, were made available for the tests.
Until recently the British Services had tended strongly to the coincidence type of instrument while the American Services had adopted the stereoscopic principle for long-base instruments at least.
The decisions of both the British and American Services apparently grow out of different interpretations of the experience of the Battle of Jutland in World War I and are of no concern in this place. Tests were run in November and December using the British seamen on the British instrument and experienced American observers on the Standard M1. Bad weather conditions and various experimental difficulties and mishaps made it impossible to obtain a really satisfactory quantity of data before the tests hall to be terminated.
Fixed target reading were made on targets from 2, to 14, yards.
0コメント